Zero Level support – an introduction and guide
Posted: February 27, 2012 Filed under: ComAround, Company stuff, News, Self Service Support, Support trends | Tags: 0 line support, 0-level support, 0-linesupport, ComAround, first line, helpdesk operation, ITIL support, organizing support, personal support, second line, self service, service desk, service desk operation, support concept, web-based self-service, Zero level, zero level support, zero line support Leave a comment »Zero Level support, or 0-level support, is a term for a support concept which involves using web-based self-service as a stage before the traditional first-line support. Zero Level support frees up time and resources for manned support and allows support to be provided more quickly. One consequence of the introduction of Zero Level support is that the right types of issues are directed to the right support channels. Web-based self-service does away with the simple, recurring issues which users could ideally resolve themselves. Zero Level support is effective as an internal form of support for employees within a company, but it is also effective as a form of external support for clients.
In the world of support – by which I mean the theoretical and frequently documented world of support – we often see descriptions of how support organisations work and can work in depth, but one problem is that the web has long been regarded as something “different”, something that is controlled by other departments within a company. In my opinion, the web is perhaps even now – when it is used – the most important tool for any support organisation. I see evidence of this every single day among clients and other companies that have made a lot of progress with their online support facilities.
Is Zero Level support our new SPOC?
SPOC (Single Point of Contact) is a service function which the service desk provides to users so that they can make contact, no matter what their issue is. Then the service desk can pass the case on (escalate it) to the right channel or person. Ideally, Zero Level support can be used in the same way. That is to say, by far the most success with web-based self-service is enjoyed by the companies that use their web-based support portals to acquire most of their cases, and then users themselves can decide whether do their own hunting for the answers to their questions in a text or video guide. If you are unable to find the answer you are looking for, you can be passed on directly from web-based support. Standard services which are made available via web-based support include case management systems, service desk telephone numbers, “click to call” and e-mail support.
So what is Zero Level support?
Zero Level support means that online support is the natural first point of contact; you do not get in touch with a support person, therefore, you look for assistance and proceed from a web-based support service. The advantage of Zero Level support is that it allows you to identify simple, recurring cases and produce easy guides to resolve these problems. As soon as a guide has been created and published via the web-based support service, it is made available to an unlimited number of users. Any service desk working to provide good services is able to keep a close eye on what the most frequently asked questions are and can work proactively and offer its users simple, clear online instructions relating to appropriate fields and selected services. A good system should also help the service desk to identify new needs and gaps so that they can supply the necessary information quickly.
Working with Zero Level support
The results rarely take a long time to come. So when you have got people used to working like this, many people are of the opinion that the web-based support channel is one of the most important resources available as it is always available and is constantly being improved as more and more knowledge is added every day. Another advantage of working with the Zero Level support concept and web-based support is that it gives service desk staff themselves an important source of knowledge and assistance. Service desks have never been subject to more stringent demands. There are more programs and IT services than ever before for support agents to be familiar with, but with a readily accessible web-based support service, service desk staff do not need to know everything off by heart. Instead, all they need to know is where to find the information.
Many case management systems have built-in knowledge bases designed to provide support for service desks. The problem is that these often work better in theory than in practice, and people rarely have time to type up guides while also manning a service desk and facing a queue of users waiting for someone to talk to. Sometimes staff do not even have time to enter cases in the case management system. Content stored in a knowledge base in a case management system can sometimes act as basic information for web-based self-service.
With this knowledge available, there are two important things to bear in mind if success is to be achieved; and not starting with an empty database is one of them. There are far too many repeat questions which are exactly or almost exactly the same, no matter what company or organisation you work for. On the one hand, you need special writing skills to be able to create user-friendly, simple guides for users at a company. It is naïve to think, for example, that everyone manning a service desk has the expertise required to write good support instructions. On many occasions, for example, it is an advantage not to have an entirely technical background, nor to be an “expert”, as this can mean that people take things for granted without thinking and can forget to consider obvious explanations that are not obvious to a “non-expert”. Another tip is always to maintain a simple “style guide” which provides a few general guidelines and rules on how guides should be produced, what elements they should include and what they should look like.
I recommend that you allocate a Content Manager role to someone on the service desk. This then makes them responsible for ensuring that the content in Zero Level support documents is always up to date and correct. It is also a good idea to introduce a procedure which involves production of new guides in all instances where they would be expected to answer most questions before new services are rolled out within an organisation, when they are needed most. This procedure may work so that a system owner, for example, provides unprocessed basic material produced by him or him or which has come directly from an external supplier, and distributes it to a Content Manager who is responsible for ensuring that suitable guides are produced and available when the IT service or program is rolled out to end-users or clients.
Five quick tips for anyone considering introducing Zero Level support:
- Choose suitable web-based self-service. Ensure that basic material with sufficient breadth and depth in the form of complete guides is available so that you do not have to start from scratch.
- Appoint one or more people (Content Managers) to stand responsible for and work with the web channel content.
- Devise realistic targets for how many cases you can handle via Zero Level support, and set a value for this.
- Set up a procedure concerning how you will get input from the rest of the company or organisation so that you can get people used to the whole concept of Zero Level support and get help when rolling out new IT services within the company or organisation. Use the fact that the systems manager is normally the person responsible for ensuring that the necessary knowledge and support are available for their system. System owners are often very willing to cooperate.
- Do not try to provide answers to all cases in Zero Level support, but consider an 80-20 approach or even a 90-10 approach; in other words, make sure that 90% of all cases can be handled of all the possible cases that might be reported. It is better to deal with the unusual cases via other channels. The most important thing is to make sure that the content of web-based self-service includes up to date material which is currently in demand.
Is there an ROI?
In short: YES. According to a Swedish survey, a self-service costs an average of $4 to resolve, while a case directed to a manned support line costs an average of $30. You can easily work out that you will save $26 (or free up resources worth $26) for every case resolved by your Zero Level support.
An entirely realistic target for Zero Level support is to resolve as many cases via the web channel as are otherwise resolved by the manned service desk. That is to say, if you have 30 000 cases a year, if you introduce Zero Level support and web-based self-service you can normally resolve a further 30 000 cases with this unmanned “zero level”, so you will resolve 60 000 cases.
Thanks for reading this article. I look forward to hearing about your experiences and receiving your questions and comments.
Who is web-based self-service actually there for?
Posted: December 21, 2011 Filed under: ComAround, Company stuff, Self Service Support, Support | Tags: ComAround, IT and support managers, IT organisation, self-service solutions, support, support organisation, web-based self-service 1 Comment »A report has recently been released in the support industry. 100 people IT and support managers responded to questions about web-based self-service.* The report reveals that an unexpectedly high number of people IT and support managers feel that web-based self-service is a tool that is there primarily to support them rather than users.
68 per cent of all IT and support managers questioned in the survey believe that self-service solutions are important for an effective support organisation. About half (54 per cent) of all IT organisations in the survey in the survey are using web-based self-service or are planning to acquire it. The most common reason why IT and support managers choose this method of support is that web-based self-service relieves the staffed support function. A clear majority, 80 per cent, believe that they use web-based self-support to supplement their staffed support function. The answers in the survey can thus be interpreted as indicating that the business and users come second, and that the purpose of self-service is primarily to assist support staff in their work.
Here are some of the comments made by IT and support managers in the survey, stating reasons why they chose to use web-based self-service in their IT organisation:
“That’s obvious, to relieve the support function.”
“To relieve the staffed support function from routine cases.”
“To help support staff and free up resources for more qualified tasks.”
“To assist and rationalise the support function.”
“To take the load off us so our engineers have time to do more useful things.”
As a supplier of self-service solutions for more than 20 years, we ourselves have always focused on users out in the organisation. We have concentrated on developing a service that is as good as possible, so that users can quickly find help to solve their problems, and we have focused our communication on our target group by talking about users and the value of self-service to this particular target group. Maybe we should do precisely the opposite? Maybe we should still always focus on ourselves, regardless of which initiatives we are currently considering investing in. Does this mean that there is a problem, and if so does it mean that users or the business will not be as happy with the support function? I believe the answer is no. It is usually said that you should help yourself first before you can help others.
Many people in the survey felt that web-based self-service relieves the support function of more basic, repetitive questions. This means that the staffed support function has more time to take care of more complicated cases, which take longer and actually require personal support. This means that more users can be helped both via the staffed support function and via web-based self-service.
We met a new customer a few weeks ago that wanted above all to introduce web-based self-service for their own support team. They are about to migrate to a new Office package and felt that in the support department they have not been given any training in the new version, and therefore view web-based self-service as a major opportunity to improve their own skills in order that they can provide their users with better, faster assistance.
Regardless of whether an IT organisation prioritises support or the business, it can be a good idea to start by introducing web-based self-service into the staffed support function. Another customer said recently that they wanted to introduce web-based self-service for the support function only, as they felt it was too big a step to introduce it throughout the whole business. They were also worried that a broader initiative would run the risk of taking too long, as they would have had to involve various departments in the project.
So, the conclusion is that it can be a good idea to start by helping yourself before you focus entirely on the one you are trying to help, and sometimes the actual underlying reason why we do something is less important, as long as the end result is the same.
Taking care of yourself can also mean taking care of others!
Or what do you think? Feel free to continue this debate by writing your opinions or experiences.
* The survey was conducted by Axándi Sweden on behalf of ComAround, who are leaders in this field.
Google Correlate gives you an outstanding overview of searches and trends
Posted: December 14, 2011 Filed under: Company stuff, News, Self Service Support, Smartphone, Support trends | Tags: ComAround, correlation, employee self service, Google correlate, Google trends, self service, SEO, trends Leave a comment »Who is Google Correlate for?
Google Correlate is a new (beta available in May 2011) tool from Google that deserves more attention than it’s managed to get so far. Google Correlate is a fantastic service for all of us working with marketing, SEO, analyses, trends and competitor monitoring. So yes, this is a fabulously sensible tool for all business developers and marketing departments to use.
What is Google Correlate?
Google Correlate is a further development of Google Trends, and what Correlate does is use a clear line diagram to show the ratios between various search terms over time. You can use it to view long-term links and trends, but also to view seasonal relationships between various search terms. Google Correlate might seem a little obtuse and limited at a first glance, but the results when you manage to find a relevant correlation (comparison) are often very interesting and clear. I assume its simplicity will help you to get started more quickly. It ought to be mentioned also that if you need – for example – to compare a separate search trend (or any other trend), you can use Excel, for instance, to correlate it to a bigger search trend using Google Correlate. I haven’t tested this, but you should – for example – be able to insert a trend concerning traffic on your website and then correlate it to the search trend for your own specific product or service.
Practical case, Google Correlate – Self Service
In my case, as I work with self service in the support industry, Google Correlate initially shows what other search terms and words are used most in connection with searches for “self service”. The quick conclusion you can draw after looking at common related searches is that people ask a lot of questions about how to organise self service services and that people often talk about what’s known as “employee self service”, i.e. self service for employees at a company, for instance. (Read our popular article “Seven steps to success with web-based self service”)
I took the information we found above, indicating that “employee self service” is commonly related to “self service”, and created a graphic comparison of how the search developed. This gives me a graphical overview of the relationship between self service and employee self service, as well as the search trend for these searches over the calendar year. Zooming into a shorter period is very easy. Search results dating back to 2003 are displayed by default. At that time, there were very few searches on self service and employee self service, so for the years 2003-2007 I opted to zoom in to show 2007 and later. You can see the results below.
The diagram shows that both self service and employee self service are popular search terms that are more common than “normal” (which is the 0 value on the X axis), and this shows that there’s been a strong upward trend for these searches since January 2007. We can also see that there’s a very high correlation between the two search terms, i.e. people searching specifically for self service are also searching for employee self service. One thing that was a bit surprising and at the same time very clear in the diagram was that searches increase dramatically around the end of the year every year. One conclusion we can draw quickly from that is that organisations review their operations ahead of the coming year and start to plan in the late autumn. The correlation between employee self service and self service isn’t quite as strong at the end of June each year, although both search terms do then see a major increase compared with the rest of the year. This could be due to the fact that users and employees have less access to their support departments than usual during this period as staffing levels are lower, and/or that people on their summer breaks are looking for solutions and searching for self service as they don’t have access to any other support channels.
One limitations you’ll quickly encounter is the fact that you can only enter ONE search term in Google Correlate and then compare it with the listed suggestions on the Correlate website. However, there is a workaround in place which allows you to compare any search terms you like. But to do this, you need sufficient amounts of search data. Copy the URL below to your browser and swap iphone and samsung galaxy for the terms you want to compare.
http://www.google.com/trends/correlate/search?e=iphone&e=samsung galaxy&t=monthly#
Another cool function is Search by drawing. This function allows you to draw a search curve and then search for matching search terms that best tie in with the curve you drew. It’s a very cool function, but it’s a bit hard to see what you’d use it for?!
Summary: Google Correlate
My impression of Google Correlate is that it’s a very positive tool, although I haven’t had a lot of time in which to get to know all its functions and features. It’s very obvious that this is a good, simple tool for anyone who needs data and facts ahead of business planning, for example. The fact that it’s easy to understand and use is a major plus. I’d guess that if I continued to use it, I’d start to wish it included certain options, and on the other hand Google needs to be quick to develop good tools like this, so maybe it won’t be long before additional functions and options are available in Correlate.
However, by far the biggest restriction at present isn’t the functionality, but the fact that Correlate only shows data from searches in the USA. Without a doubt, this will be extended to the rest of the world before long. This will provide a further dimension where you can view common search terms by market in correlation to your industry.
If you have a spare five minutes, I strongly recommend you click on the link below and start comparing your search terms in Google Correlate. I don’t think you’ll be disappointed.
Here’s the address: http://www.google.com/trends/correlate/
Here is a guide on how to use Google Correlate
Share your experiences of Google Correlate below. Thank you!
Some more great articles on Google Correlate:
http://www.sokmotorkonsult.se/seo/ta-pulsen-pa-varlden-med-google-correlate (in Swedish)
http://www.seoptimise.com/blog/2011/05/how-to-use-google-correlate-for-keyword-research.html







